The True Cost of ATG’s Core Based Licensing

This is a follow up from a post I made 8 months ago: Why ATG’s Core Based Licensing is Stupid

With the new Westmere hex-core CPU’s out now, the problem has gotten worse.  A mid-high or high end Westmere CPU presents as 12 cores.  So what does this really mean?

I just ran the numbers, and basically a mid-high end single CPU server in 2008 (Xeon 5450) would cost me 4 ATG cores worth of licensing, and would handle X amount of traffic.

A mid-high end single CPU server in 2010 (Westmere 5650) would cost me 12 ATG cores worth of licensing, and will only handle X+35 to 70% traffic (based on published SPECint, SPECint_rate, and SPECfp scores for the CPUs).

So it’s a 300% increase in costs to handle 35 to 70% more traffic.  Or just to provision with modern hardware.  That’s crazy.

6 thoughts on “The True Cost of ATG’s Core Based Licensing

  1. If you use a CPU server like Xeon, you shouldn’t be suprised with your costs, (also running costs, hidden costs etc) With the hex-core it is evident that your going to be looking at well over 300% more like 500% increas in all combined costs. This is a major traffic violation in my opinion.

    • Well, the ATG license costs eclipse your standard server related costs (power, racking, etc..) by several orders of magnitude. Unless I”m missing what you were talking about.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>