<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seam EntityHome Design Pattern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/seam-entityhome-design-pattern.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/seam-entityhome-design-pattern.html</link>
	<description>Java, ATG, Seam, and related Technologies</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Devon</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/seam-entityhome-design-pattern.html#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/?p=94#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>Siarhei,

well ATG has several products which stack on one another.  The base layer is somewhat similar to what Seam+Hibernate offers: component lifecycle, configuration, data access, etc...

The upper layer products provide personalization, commerce, etc...  Which obviously Seam doesn't cover.

I don't think it would make sense to try to run the two of them together.  The upper layers of ATG products are tightly coupled to the lower ATG framework, and running the two together wouldn't work too well.

That said, I think there's a lot that each framework could learn from the other.

Devon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siarhei,</p>
<p>well ATG has several products which stack on one another.  The base layer is somewhat similar to what Seam+Hibernate offers: component lifecycle, configuration, data access, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>The upper layer products provide personalization, commerce, etc&#8230;  Which obviously Seam doesn&#8217;t cover.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it would make sense to try to run the two of them together.  The upper layers of ATG products are tightly coupled to the lower ATG framework, and running the two together wouldn&#8217;t work too well.</p>
<p>That said, I think there&#8217;s a lot that each framework could learn from the other.</p>
<p>Devon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siarhei</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/seam-entityhome-design-pattern.html#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>Siarhei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/?p=94#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Hi Devon,

I see that you also do ATG. What is your experience in comparing JBoss+Seam with ATG? There is very little info on what exactly ATG is but I also see that ATG is an official partner of JBoss (and that framework from ATG it can run on JBoss as well?). Is it possible to use ATG and JBoss Seam together? Am I even talking any sense here?

Thanks in advance!

Siarhei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Devon,</p>
<p>I see that you also do ATG. What is your experience in comparing JBoss+Seam with ATG? There is very little info on what exactly ATG is but I also see that ATG is an official partner of JBoss (and that framework from ATG it can run on JBoss as well?). Is it possible to use ATG and JBoss Seam together? Am I even talking any sense here?</p>
<p>Thanks in advance!</p>
<p>Siarhei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
