<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Devon Hillard&#039;s Digital Sanctuary &#187; postfix</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/tag/postfix/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog</link>
	<description>Java, ATG, Seam, and related Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:04:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SpamCop RBL is Blocking Several Facebook Mail Servers</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/spamcop-rbl-is-blocking-several-facebook-mail-servers.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/spamcop-rbl-is-blocking-several-facebook-mail-servers.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FaceBook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postfix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/?p=603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are using the SpamCop realtime block list as part of your anti-spam measures, be warned that they appear to be blocking several legitimate Facebook mail servers. I&#8217;ve seen them blocking the following Facebook mail server IPs: 69.63.178.169 69.63.178.172 &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/spamcop-rbl-is-blocking-several-facebook-mail-servers.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are using the SpamCop realtime block list as part of your anti-spam measures, be warned that they appear to be blocking several legitimate Facebook mail servers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen them blocking the following Facebook mail server IPs:</p>
<ul>
<li>69.63.178.169</li>
<li>69.63.178.172</li>
<li>69.63.178.175</li>
</ul>
<p>Presumably there&#8217;s a whole block of IPs that SpamCop is blocking.  Since I like to get e-mail from Facebook, I have currently disabled my SpamCop RBL check.  You may want to do the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/spamcop-rbl-is-blocking-several-facebook-mail-servers.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please Stop Using Yahoo Mail</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/please-stop-using-yahoo-mail.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/please-stop-using-yahoo-mail.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yahoo mail servers have been consistently delaying or rejecting e-mails for over a year. You can read about it here: http://www.ahfx.net/weblog.php?article=107 Or just Google for &#8220;4.16.50&#8243;. The short of it is that even with a low volume personal mail server, &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/please-stop-using-yahoo-mail.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo mail servers have been consistently delaying or rejecting e-mails for over a year.  You can read about it here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ahfx.net/weblog.php?article=107">http://www.ahfx.net/weblog.php?article=107</a></p>
<p>Or just Google for &#8220;4.16.50&#8243;.</p>
<p>The short of it is that even with a low volume personal mail server, with the correct spf records, without running an open relay, without being blacklisted by ANY blacklist site/service, Yahoo still won&#8217;t deliver e-mail from you.  And they aren&#8217;t responsive about addressing the problem.</p>
<p>So please, if you use Yahoo mail, switch to GMail.  You&#8217;ll like it more, and more importantly, you&#8217;ll actually get e-mail people are trying to send you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/spam/please-stop-using-yahoo-mail.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10MinuteMail Performance Improvement</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/10minutemail/10minutemail-performance-improvement.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/10minutemail/10minutemail-performance-improvement.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10MinuteMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postfix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After having a clearly better approach to mail delivery pointed out to me by a friend yesterday, I pushed a new version of 10MinuteMail out last night. End users shouldn&#8217;t notice anything different, but behind the scenes the mail acceptance &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/10minutemail/10minutemail-performance-improvement.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having a clearly better approach to mail delivery pointed out to me by a friend yesterday, I pushed a new version of 10MinuteMail out last night.  End users shouldn&#8217;t notice anything different, but behind the scenes the mail acceptance and delivery is MUCH higher performing.  There should be less incoming mail delays, slow pages, and less domain changing.  Inactive e-mail addresses will return a bounce notice now, as they probably should have done from the start.</p>
<p>I apologize for the delivery issues yesterday, before I made the change, the amount of incoming junk was really slamming on the server.  Hopefully that&#8217;s a thing of the past now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/10minutemail/10minutemail-performance-improvement.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10MinuteMail Updates</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/10minutemail-updates.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/10minutemail-updates.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10MinuteMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ad-aware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ajax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internationalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/10minutemail-updates.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just pushed a new version of 10MinuteMail. Here are the notable updates: Removed the Ad-Aware links and text. No one was clicking on them anyhow. Added some translation fixes. Implemented AJAX based (RichFaces) refreshing of the list of e-mails &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/10minutemail-updates.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just pushed a new version of 10MinuteMail.  Here are the notable updates:</p>
<ol>
<li>Removed the Ad-Aware links and text.  No one was clicking on them anyhow.</li>
<li>Added some translation fixes.</li>
<li>Implemented AJAX based (RichFaces) refreshing of the list of e-mails in your inbox.</li>
<li>Added smtp client throttling (in Postfix) to limit the number of messages accepted from a single source within 60 seconds.  This seems to have already fixed the negative impact of high volume spammers on the function of the site.</li>
<li>Removed the &#8220;Get Another E-Mail&#8221; feature.  While this was a user request, I discovered that it was being abused by spammers.</li>
<li>Added a Forward feature to allow you to forward a received e-mail to your home account for storage.</li>
</ol>
<p>Enjoy!  If you have any issues with the AJAX refreshes, let me know, but I think it should work better now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/java/jboss/seam/10minutemail-updates.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to cleanout your postfix queues by sender</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/debian/how-to-cleanout-your-postfix-queues-by-sender.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/debian/how-to-cleanout-your-postfix-queues-by-sender.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Devon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[10MinuteMail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postfix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/archives/18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is mostly to help me remember how to do this, if the situation arises again. I just had a lot of mail backup on my server. The 10MinuteMail inbox was over 300 MB (usually it kept below a &#8230; <a href="http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/debian/how-to-cleanout-your-postfix-queues-by-sender.html">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is mostly to help me remember how to do this, if the situation arises again.</p>
<p>I just had a lot of mail backup on my server.  The 10MinuteMail inbox was over 300 MB (usually it kept below a megabyte), Postfix&#8217;s active queue was maxed out at 20,003 entries (why the 3, I don&#8217;t know), and the incoming queue was another 20,000+.  Basically everything was all backed up.  I&#8217;m not 100% sure how this condition gets started.  I&#8217;ve seen it a few times on my old server when super high volumes of incoming mail deliveries combined with other sites I hope serving up high bandwidth to end users.  This is the first time it&#8217;s happened on the new server.  It may be time to change out the domain that the 10MinuteMail e-mail addresses are using.</p>
<p>Regardless, using qshape I was able to identify a handful of from addresses (presumably either spammers or a cyclic bounce issue) which accounted for  over 8,000 of the mail in the active queue.  By using the following command I was able to purge out just those messages from the queue:</p>
<p><code>mailq|awk ' /^[0-9A-F][0-9A-F]*.*error.mag2.com$/ {print $1}'|tr -d '*'| xargs -rn1 postsuper -d</code></p>
<p>Where error.mag2.com is the domain, or from address you wish to delete.  This works pretty well.  I may whip up a bash script to handle this in the future.</p>
<p>For reference, the worst offenders are:</p>
<ol>
<li align="left">magerr.combzmail.jp</li>
<li align="left">prjapanmail.jp</li>
<li align="left">error.mag2.com</li>
<li align="left">accessmail.jp</li>
<li align="left">mayld.net</li>
</ol>
<p>Why so many from Japan?  I have no idea&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.digitalsanctuary.com/tech-blog/debian/how-to-cleanout-your-postfix-queues-by-sender.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/30 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 490/551 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.digitalsanctuary.com @ 2012-02-07 00:04:04 -->
